static-testing

Static Testing - Everything You Need to Know

When it comes to software development, catching errors early can save time, reduce costs, and improve the quality of your product. This is where static testing comes into play. Unlike dynamic testing, which involves executing the code, static testing focuses on reviewing the software’s code, documentation, and other project artifacts without actually running the program. It’s like proofreading a book before printing – ensuring everything is in place before it’s finalized.

So, what exactly is static testing, and how can it be conducted effectively? Let’s dive in!

We can help you drive software testing as a key initiative aligned to your business goals

Contact us

What is Static Testing?

Static testing is a type of software testing that involves the examination of the software’s code, documentation, and other project artifacts without executing the program. The goal is to find defects early in the development process by reviewing the code and related documents to ensure they meet specified standards and are free of errors. Static testing helps identify issues like syntax errors, code quality problems, and logical mistakes before the code is executed.

Group 1000007993

Examples of Static Testing include:

  • Reviewing source code to identify syntax and logical errors.
  • Checking design documents to ensure the software architecture aligns with requirements.
  • Inspecting requirements documentation for clarity and completeness.

Types of Static Testing

Before diving into how to conduct static testing, let’s take a look at the types of static testing that you may encounter:

  1. Code reviews: A manual process where developers review each other's code to identify errors, improve quality, and ensure compliance with coding standards.
  2. Static code analysis: Automated tools are used to analyze the source code for potential errors, security vulnerabilities, or violations of coding standards.
  3. Walkthroughs: A formal process where the development team reviews the software’s design or code step by step to ensure it meets requirements.
  4. Inspections: A more rigorous review process that involves a detailed inspection of code or documentation by a team of reviewers to detect defects.
  5. Peer reviews: A collaborative approach where team members review each other’s code to provide feedback and catch potential issues early.

static-testing-techniques

Why is Static Testing so important?

Static testing plays a crucial role in the development process. It’s more than just finding bugs—its primary focus is ensuring software quality from the start.

Here are some key reasons why static testing is essential:

  • Early detection of errors: By identifying defects early in the process, static testing helps prevent costly fixes down the line. Catching bugs in the design phase or during code review is far cheaper than fixing them later in production.
  • Improves code quality: Static testing encourages developers to write cleaner, more efficient code by adhering to coding standards and guidelines, improving overall quality.
  • Increases efficiency: It helps streamline the development process by reducing the number of defects that make it to later testing stages, resulting in faster development cycles.
  • Cost-effective: Static testing helps reduce the cost of defects by catching them early. The earlier a bug is found, the cheaper it is to fix.
  • Compliance: For industries that require software to meet certain standards or regulations, static testing ensures that code and documentation comply with these requirements.

How to conduct Static Testing in 6 steps

1. Prepare the artifacts

The first step in conducting static testing is to gather all the necessary documents and code that need to be reviewed. This could include various project artifacts such as the source code, design documents, requirements, and test plans. It’s essential to ensure that all relevant files are at your disposal before you begin the review process. This step sets the stage for a smooth and thorough review, as having all the required materials upfront minimizes delays and ensures no critical documents are overlooked.

2. Select the review type

Once you have all the necessary artifacts, the next step is to choose the appropriate type of static testing based on your goals. If you're looking to identify coding errors or adherence to coding standards, a code review might be the best approach. On the other hand, if you're verifying whether the software’s design matches the project’s requirements, a walkthrough might be more suitable. Understanding the type of review that fits your needs helps to focus the effort and ensures that the testing process is effective in uncovering potential issues.

3. Identify the key focus areas

Before diving into the actual review process, it’s crucial to define the key focus areas. What specific aspects of the code or documentation are you going to review? Are you prioritizing syntax errors in the source code, or are you more focused on ensuring the software design aligns with the business requirements? Establishing clear goals for the review helps to ensure that the process remains focused, efficient, and aligned with the broader project objectives. This clarity will help reviewers identify the most critical issues that could impact the project’s success.

4. Conduct the review

With the artifacts prepared and the review type and focus areas defined, you can now carry out the actual review. The method you use will depend on the static testing technique you selected. For example, during a code review, developers manually inspect the code for potential bugs, logical errors, or deviations from coding standards. In contrast, if you're using automated static analysis tools, such as SonarQube or Checkmarx, the tools will scan the code for vulnerabilities, inefficiencies, and other potential issues. Regardless of the method, the goal is to thoroughly assess the code or documentation to catch defects early in the development process.

5. Document findings

After completing the review, the next step is to document all the issues you’ve identified. Be as specific as possible about what the problem is, where it’s located (which lines of code or sections of the document), and, if possible, how it can be resolved. This detailed documentation is invaluable for developers and team members working on fixing the defects. Having a clear record ensures that no issues are missed and provides guidance for improving the overall quality of the software. It's essential to prioritize the issues based on their severity and impact on the project.

6. Retest and validate

Once the identified issues have been addressed and fixed, it’s time to retest the code or documentation to ensure that the problems have been resolved. This is an important step to verify that the changes made have been effective and did not introduce new issues into the system. Retesting ensures the quality and accuracy of the software before it proceeds to further testing phases or is released into production. This validation step is essential in maintaining high-quality standards throughout the development cycle and ensuring the software meets its intended goals.

Common challenges in Static Testing

While static testing is invaluable, it does come with its own set of challenges:

  • False Positives: Automated static analysis tools may flag issues that aren’t actual defects, leading to unnecessary investigations.
  • Overlooking Logic Errors: Static testing is not always effective at catching logical or runtime errors, which is why it should be complemented with dynamic testing techniques.
  • Limited Scope: Static testing can’t test the actual execution of the software, so it must be used in conjunction with other testing methods to ensure a comprehensive testing approach.

Best practices for effective Static Testing

Establish clear standards

One of the most effective ways to ensure static testing success is by establishing clear and consistent standards for coding and documentation. These standards should cover a range of practices, from naming conventions to formatting rules and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Following these guidelines makes it easier to detect errors during static testing and improves the overall quality of the software. Clear standards also ensure consistency across the team, reducing the likelihood of misunderstandings or overlooked issues.

Example: If your team adopts a naming convention for variables, static testing tools can easily flag violations of the rule, making it clear where the issue is and how to correct it. A consistent format for error messages also helps static testers quickly spot discrepancies.

Automate where possible

Static testing becomes more efficient when you automate as much of the process as possible. By using static analysis tools, you can automatically check for syntax errors, security vulnerabilities, or adherence to coding standards. These tools help identify issues that might be difficult or time-consuming for a human tester to find, reducing human error and saving time.

How it can be done more easily: Implement tools like SonarQube, ESLint, or Checkmarx in your continuous integration (CI) pipeline. These tools automatically scan your code whenever it’s updated, flagging any issues before they reach manual review.

Prioritize security

Security must always be a priority during static testing. Integrating security-focused static testing helps identify vulnerabilities early in development, reducing the risk of breaches later on. Specialized static analysis tools can focus on flaws like SQL injection or cross-site scripting (XSS), and security experts can provide additional oversight to ensure all potential risks are addressed.

How it can be fixed: Integrating security tools like Checkmarx or Veracode into your CI pipeline can catch vulnerabilities early. For example, if an analysis tool detects unsanitized user input, this can be addressed immediately by applying proper input validation.

Test for compatibility

Testing for compatibility ensures that your code works well across different platforms and environments, such as operating systems, browsers, or hardware configurations. Static testing can help catch compatibility issues early, saving time and effort in later development stages when these issues may become harder and costlier to resolve.

Example: Using tools like BrowserStack or Sauce Labs during static testing can help identify compatibility issues across browsers. If an analysis tool reveals that a JavaScript function doesn’t work in a particular browser, the team can fix it early in the development cycle.

Review documentation and requirements

Static testing isn’t just about code; it also involves reviewing related documentation and project requirements. Inconsistent or incomplete documentation can lead to misunderstandings during development. By reviewing requirements and design documents, you ensure that the software is being built according to specifications, addressing discrepancies before they become problems.

How it can be fixed: Encourage regular reviews of documentation by the entire team. Use tools like Confluence or Google Docs with version control to track changes and allow team members to provide feedback before development begins.

Use Version Control Systems

Version control systems (VCS) like Git are essential for effective static testing. They help you track changes to the codebase, ensuring that static testing is applied consistently across different versions of the software. By reviewing the history of changes, you can identify when errors or inconsistencies were introduced.

How it can be done easier: Integrate static testing into your version control process by automatically triggering static analysis every time a new commit is pushed to the repository. This ensures that issues are caught immediately and that the codebase remains up to standard.

Emphasize code quality over quantity

While static testing helps catch errors, it’s also important to focus on overall code quality. Code that is poorly written or overly complex is harder to maintain and more prone to future errors. Static testing should not only identify issues but also promote the use of clean, readable, and maintainable code.

Example: Encourage developers to refactor overly complex code or adopt design patterns that enhance simplicity and scalability. Tools like SonarQube can score code quality, helping developers identify areas for improvement in readability and maintainability.

Global App Testing and Static Testing?

Global App Testing (GAT) provides end-to-end software testing services, ensuring that applications are thoroughly validated across multiple devices, environments, and regions. While static testing focuses on identifying issues in code, documentation, and other artifacts before execution, GAT can provide you with comprehensive testing solutions that go hand in hand with static testing to ensure functionality, performance, and security are optimized. GAT’s services complement static testing by addressing dynamic aspects of the application and testing across real-world conditions.

Key features of Global App Testing include:

  • Functional Testing: Validates software functionality through scripted and unscripted tests, ensuring real-world accuracy.
  • User Experience (UX) Enhancement: Simulates real-world user interactions to identify and resolve usability issues.
  • Localization Testing: Ensures that applications are adapted for different languages, currencies, and cultural nuances to provide a seamless global experience.
  • Crowdsourced Testing: Leverages a global network of testers to provide diverse insights and ensure the software meets international standards.

Sign up today to schedule a call and explore how Global App Testing can enhance your static testing efforts and deliver a reliable, secure, and seamless application!

We can help you drive software testing as a key initiative aligned to your business goals

Contact us

Keep learning

The only exploratory testing checklist you need
How to test WooCommerce checkout and payments
10 Best load testing tools to consider